From: Serhat Uslay (serhat.uslay_at_zurich.com.au)
Date: Tue Sep 28 2004 - 01:01:43 GMT
bu her katta kac kullanici olacagina baglidir (pek cok baska seylerin
yaninda). Genellikle bit kanalda 20 den fazla kullanici verimsiz olur.
Mesela, 100 kullanicin varsa en iyisi bunu kanallara bolmektir. Eger bir
kati bir kanala bolersen bu problemleri cozmekte kolaylik saglar.
Please respond to cisco-ttl_at_yahoogroups.com
Subject: [cisco-ttl] wireless ag
Avlusu olan bir binayi wireless ag ile kapsamak istiyoruz,
Tek bir wireless ag var. Agin saglikli olabilmesi icin
kat cihazlarinin kanallari ayri mi olmali?
Yoksa fark etmezmi?
Yorumlariniz icin simdiden tesekkurler,
Bu listenin Cisco Systems ile herhangi bir baglantisi bulunmamaktadir.
Listeden cikmak için cisco-ttl-unsubscribe_at_yahoogroups.com adresine bir
Yahoo! Groups Links
---- This email is intended for the named recipient only. It may contain information which is confidential, commercially sensitive, or copyright. If you are not the intended recipient you must not reproduce or distribute any part of the email, disclose its contents, or take any action in reliance. If you have received this email in error, please contact the sender and delete the message. It is your responsibility to scan this email and any attachments for viruses and other defects. To the extent permitted by law, Zurich and its associates will not be liable for any loss or damage arising in any way from this communication including any file attachments. We may monitor email you send to us, either as a reply to this email or any email you send to us, to confirm our systems are protected and for compliance with company policies. Although we take reasonable precautions to protect the confidentiality of our email systems, we do not warrant the confidentiality or security of email or attachments we receive.
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Tue Sep 28 2004 - 05:02:26 GMT